Bob Work and Bridge Colby quoted in The Atlantic article, “The New Concept Everyone in Washington Is Talking About”

"'In the first [term of the] Obama administration, the focus really was on trying to work so that China would be a responsible stakeholder in the international community,' Work told me. 'Competition was a word that... didn’t convey what we were trying to do. But by the end of the administration, the administration just said, "Hey, China is truly a competitor, and we need to hedge against future bad behavior."' "...Colby, who recently left the Center for a New American Security [...]

2019-08-22T12:06:41-04:00August 6, 2019|News|

Bridge Colby cited in The Japan Times article, “U.S. Plan to Fight China and Russia is Too Good To Be True”

"Second, horizontal escalation suffers from a time problem. Coercion — particularly economic coercion — takes a while to work. But in the meantime, analysts such as former Trump administration Pentagon official Elbridge Colby have pointed out that the aggressor will be consolidating its gains and fortifying a position from which it cannot easily be dislodged. While the U.S. is waiting for coercion to have its effect, the situation on the ground — and at the negotiating table — will be steadily [...]

Bridge Colby cited in South China Morning Post: “What’s the difference between Indo Pacific and Asia-Pacific? Regional control for the U.S. or China”

"Elbridge Colby of the Washington-based Centre for a New American Security, however, maintained that the U.S. was not asking Southeast Asian nations to choose sides but was willing to help anyone who 'wants to defend their sovereignty' from Chinese economic coercion." Read the full article here: Full Article

2019-08-22T12:18:39-04:00June 24, 2019|News|

Bridge Colby quoted in The Atlantic article, “Trump Might Not Want War, but the Military Is Steering His Iran Policy”

"...It’s not clear yet, though, where the current buildup leaves the Defense Department’s longer-term objectives to focus on great-power competition. 'China is a much much more significant military challenge than Iran,' Elbridge Colby, a former defense official and one of the architects of the National Defense Strategy, told me. 'We absolutely must focus on China and to a lesser extent Russia, and figure out ways to deal with Iran in a more economical fashion. Some of the ideas being floated seem [...]

2019-08-22T12:19:51-04:00June 20, 2019|News|

Bridge Colby quoted in Foreign Policy: “‘Fort Trump’ for Poland? Not Quite.”

"While the Pentagon has identified China as the greatest threat to the United States and its allies, Russia is a key immediate problem, said Elbridge Colby, who served as deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development until 2018. “'The Russian threat, while definitely more limited and more circumscribed, is more pointed right now primarily because it’s a land border, there’s no natural topographical division between Russia and NATO territory,' said Colby, who is now at the Center for [...]

2019-08-22T12:20:13-04:00June 12, 2019|News|

Bridge Colby quoted in Reuters article: “As Shanahan heads to Asia, Iran tensions threaten Pentagon’s ‘great power’ focus”

"...'China can change the world... we can’t afford to lose in Asia. Asia is the crown jewel,' said Elbridge Colby, who led the Pentagon’s development of the National Defence Strategy. “'So we have to stay in the Middle East, but you’ve got to turn down the temperature and the demand signal,' said Colby, currently with the Centre for a New American Security." Read the full article here: Full Article

2019-08-22T12:27:25-04:00May 27, 2019|News|

Bridge Colby quoted in The Wall Street Journal article, “U.S. Pacific Commander Seeks More Funding to Counter China”

“‘Nothing is more important’ than getting the commander at IndoPacom what he needs, said Elbridge Colby, who was instrumental in the writing of the National Defense Strategy when he worked at the Pentagon. “‘Some people just don’t think it’s possible that we could lose a war against China or Russia if the Department doesn’t change fast. I think that misplaced disbelief is behind a lot of the inertia,’ Mr. Colby said in an email. “‘The Department is shifting well for such [...]

2020-04-07T17:03:26-04:00April 17, 2019|Cybersecurity & Defense|

Bridge Colby with Walter Slocombe in The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung: “Respond to INF Collapse with Blunt Layer, Not a Repeat of Euromissiles”

"The INF Treaty has collapsed on the basis of Russian violation. Many seem to think that we are on the verge of a repeat of the 1980s, complete with Russian missiles aimed at Europe and new variants of American Euromissiles to counter them. "Russia does pose a threat to NATO Europe’s security. The way to deal with this is not, however, to respond to Russia’s new land-based missiles with deployments in Europe of new American ground launched systems that can reach [...]

2020-04-07T17:25:09-04:00April 3, 2019|Cybersecurity & Defense|

Bridge Colby in Defense One: “Is the Pentagon Truly Committed to the National Defense Strategy?”

"As Senate and House committees examine the Trump administration’s proposed defense budget for fiscal 2020 — it totals three-quarters of a trillion dollars — the first and most important question they should ask is: Does this budget decisively improve the U.S. posture for great-power competition with China and Russia? "The 2018 National Defense Strategy developed under the leadership of Secretary James Mattis made clear the need to prioritize major improvements in the U.S. ability to deter Chinese or Russian aggression. In [...]

2020-04-07T16:36:35-04:00March 12, 2019|Cybersecurity & Defense|

Bridge Colby in The Wall Street Journal: “Take India’s Side, America”

"The moment of maximum danger in the latest India-Pakistan conflict appears to have passed. But after a major attack by Pakistani militants on an Indian military base in Kashmir and the first Indian air strike on Pakistan proper since 1971, tensions are still smoldering between the two South Asian nuclear powers. The episode highlights the need for the U.S. to reassess its role in this volatile part of the world—and to come down firmly on India’s side..." Read the full article [...]

2020-04-07T16:36:47-04:00March 12, 2019|Cybersecurity & Defense|
Go to Top